Berkeley Unified Superintendent Donald Evans speaks to parents Tuesday at a forum on the new spending law. Credit: Mark Coplan, Berkeley Unified School District

Berkeley Unified Superintendent Donald Evans speaks to parents last month at a forum on the new spending police. Some districts accept already begun to engage parents in the budget process, knowing that the regulations and template for the Local Control and Accountability Plan would be passed this month. Credit: Mark Coplan, Berkeley Unified School District

Engaging parents is 1 of eight priorities that school districts must accost under the police force creating the new state finance system, the Local Control Funding Formula. Parental and community involvement volition besides shortly get a guiding force behind the funding system's central chemical element: a three-year budget plan explicitly tying spending to student achievement goals that every commune must create.

On Thursday, the State Board will laissez passer the template for that document, the Local Control and Accountability Plan or LCAP (starting on folio 7). The Board also will adopt regulations instructing districts on how much latitude they will have – too much, according to some advocates for disadvantaged children – in spending the money that the funding formula earmarks for low-income students, English learners and foster youth.

The goal of the Local Command Funding Formula is to decentralize ability and shift conclusion making from Sacramento to local districts. Together, the LCAP template and the spending regulations volition brand that happen – and establish what the arrangement'south architect, State Lath President Michael Kirst, hopes will be a new national model.

What's in the LCAP

In the start of its three sections, the proposed LCAP (starting on folio seven) provides guidelines for reaching out formally, through commune advisory committees, and informally to parents, teachers, students and others in the community.

The second section requires that the district state how its goals and actions reply to the eight state priorities for all students and for subgroups of students, specially the students getting additional dollars. Goals might include increasing access to Advanced Placement courses, with a focus on Hispanic students; raising graduation rates; and increasing parental participation in back-to-schoolhouse nights. It asks the district to list the data and metrics on which the district gear up its goals. And it requires the district to item how goals and actions may differ by private school, implying that the district should be incorporating suggestions of school site councils. Deportment might include recruiting and preparation more than teachers to teach AP courses, calculation Partnership Academies that engage students at risk of dropping out in task internships, and introducing home visits to students with high absentee rates.

The third section requires the commune to particular how much programs and services to reach various goals will cost, with breakdowns for students subgroups. It should be clear how the extra dollars for high-needs students will be spent.

The biggest disagreement, which volition generate the most testimony on Th, will be over the rules for allowing districts to spend those extra dollars for schoolwide or districtwide purposes. Advocates for poor and English-learning students acknowledge benefits from districtwide learning strategies, like adding extra periods for all low-performing students or grooming all teachers in how to improve English learners' reading skills. But they desire stricter rules to prevent money targeted for high-needs students going to purposes with picayune directly benefit for those students, like granting across-the-board staff raises or buying tablet computers for all students. The proposed provisions "adventure undermining the significant progress that has been made to ensure these grant dollars will do good the students who generated them," said a Jan. x letter of the alphabet to the Land Board from 30 children's rights and community organizations.

The initial LCAP will be a three-year program, taking effect on July ane for the 2014-fifteen school year. It will be updated annually, with districts asked to cite metrics showing progress in meeting district goals. County offices of education must approve each district's LCAP; they can't modify it but can send it dorsum for changes.

Guiding questions for involving parents

The law's underlying assumption is that local schoolhouse boards will make wise decisions, based on local needs, after listening to and including the communication of the community, especially parents. The LCAP doesn't dictate how that volition take place, simply information technology does require a school board to certificate the process past addressing a series of questions. A failure to answer questions fully would be revealing – and in theory grounds for reviewers at the county role of education to reject the LCAP and commune upkeep.

Those questions, in the opening department of the LCAP, include:

  • How did the district reach out to a range of groups – not but parents in general but likewise guardians of foster children, parents of English learners, community organizations, teachers unions and students?
  • Did it practice so early on in the process to let for meaningful discussions?
  • What information and metrics did the district provide parents and members of the district advisory committee?
  • What changes were made to the district's LCAP equally a outcome of the suggestions it received?
  • Did information technology listen to schoolhouse site councils, which will continue to meet and make recommendations for their schools, every bit earlier?

Under state and federal law, districts are required to solicit ideas and recommendations from school site councils for spending of chiselled grants. Critics say some principals and school boards merely pay lip service to the police force and and so dubiousness the LCAP will make a difference. "All of the decisions on allotment of funding will be made backside closed doors by school district administrators without 'real' public and parental input, and will be packaged past the district like a large Christmas nowadays in a marshmallow PowerPoint that no boilerplate college graduate tin sympathize — and Board will safe stamp after 72 hours of review," commented an EdSource reader from Mountain Diablo Unified.

"We have experienced that frustration. I was a school site quango chair for five years," said Roberta Furger, a congregation-based community organizing network. Furger will call on the Country Lath to be clearer on the office of schoolhouse site councils in helping to shape the LCAP and to exist more than explicit on expectations and best practices: who should be on a district parent advisory committee, when and where meetings should be held, how to make data understandable and available, how to all-time acquire what parents really desire from their schools. Guiding questions are not the same equally guidance, she  said.

But at the same time, Furger said, "We have to encompass this opportunity and hold everyone answerable for the spirit and letter of the alphabet of the regs. This is our shot at bringing the community into the process and to serve kids who have been underserved for years."

Brooks Allen, the new deputy policy manager and assistant legal counsel to the State Lath of Education, said, "There volition always be some skepticism about something that is new. One can't argue against a hypothetical." But zero on this calibration has been tried across the nation to integrate budget and instructional goals, he said, and there will be mistaken comparisons with site councils. With the LCAP, the total budget will exist subject area to a public scrutiny; specific state priorities must be aligned to district goals and shared with advisory committees, and reviewed past county offices of teaching, he said. The intent is for a two-way conversation, Allen said.

"At that place will be some variance amidst districts," Allen said. "A lot of success will depend on effective engagement procedure. We hope that this will limit the outliers."

John Fensterwald covers country education policy. Contact him and follow him on Twitter @jfenster. For EdSource Today's full coverage of thursday east Local Control Funding Formula, go here.

To go more reports similar this 1, click here to sign upward for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in pedagogy.